Event Comment: Mainpiece: Never acted before. Characters new dressed &c. [See
Theatrical Review; or, Annals of the Drama, 1763, pp. 67-74: Bless us what a sweet consistent piece of business is a modern Tragedy." See
Boswell's account of
his attendance that night with two friends, With oaken cudgels in our hands and shrill sounding catcalls in our pockets," ready prepared to damn
the play (
London Journal), p. 154 ff.).]
Critical Strictures on the New Tragedy of Elvira, published t
his month (
Gentleman's Magazine). I
then undressed for
the Play. My fa
ther and I went to
the Rose, in
the Passage of
the Playhouse, where we found
Mallet, with about thirty friends. We dined toge
ther, and went from
thence into
the Pitt, where we took our places in a body, ready to silence all opposition. However, we had no occasion to exert ourselves. Not withstanding
the malice of a party, Mallet's nation, connections and indeed imprudence, we heard nothing but applause. I think it was deserved.
The play was borrowed from
de la Motte, but
the details and language have great merit. A fine Vein of dramatick poetry runs thro'
the piece.
The Scenes between
the fa
ther and son awaken almost every sensation of
the human breast; and
the Council would have equally moved, but for
the inconvenience unavoidable upon all
Theatres, that of entrusting fine Speeches to indifferent Actors.
The perplexity of
the Catastrophe is much, and I believe justly, critisized. But ano
ther defect made a strong impression upon me. When a Poet ventures upon
the dreadful situation of a fa
ther who condemns
his son to death;
there is no medium;
the fa
ther must ei
ther be monster or a Hero.
His obligations of justice, of
the publick good, must be as binding, as apparent as perhaps those of
the first
Brutus.
The cruel necessity consecrates
his actions, and leaves no room for repentance.
The thought is shocking, if not carried into action. In
the execution of Brutus's sons I am sensible of that fatal necessity. Without such an example,
the unsettled liberty of
Romev would have perished
the instant after its birth. But
Alonzo might have pardoned
his son for a rash attempt,
the cause of which was a private injury, and whose consequences could never have disturbed an established government. He might have pardoned such a crime in any o
ther subject; and
the laws could exact only a equal rigor for a son; a Vain appetite for glory, and a mad affectation of Heroism, could only influence him to exert an unequal & superior severity (
Gibbon's Journal, ed.
D. M. Low [New
York, n.d.], pp. 202-4)