Event Comment: [
Macklin dismissed after this night.  See 
the account in 
The Genuine Arguments of the Council, with the Opinion of the Court of the King's Bench, &c., By a Citizen of 
the World, (
London, 1774).  Extracts in E. R. 
Page, George Colman, the Elder (
New York, 1935).  See notes for 23 and 30 Oct. and 
the subsequent action in note for 20 Nov.  He did not return until 18 May 1775.  This night was aparently, except for #4 5s. which was not recorded on 
the books of 
the theatre until 18 June well after 
the season closed.  Macklin's suit in court against 
the rioters was judged 24 Feb. 1775.  A column and a half account of 
the trial appeared in 
the Public Advertiser, Saturday 13 May 1775, giving 
the testimony of 
the witnesses accused of starting 
the riot, 
the lawyers, and 
the judge.  
The accused were 
Leigh, 
Miles, 
James, 
Aldus, and 
Clarke.  
The first four were convicted of a conspiracy and a riot, 
the last of a riot only.  During 
the Course of 
the Business 
Lord Mansfield took Occasion to observe, that 
the Right of Hissing, and Applauding in a 
theatre was an unalterable Right, but 
there was a wide Distinction between expressing 
the natural Sensations of 
the Mind as 
they arose on what was seen and heard, and executing a pre-concerted Desagn, not only to hiss an Actor when he was playing a Part in which he was universally allowed to be excellent, but also to drive him from 
the theatre, and effect his utter ruin."  See also 
William W. Appleton, 
Charles Macklin, An Actors Life (
Cambridge, Mass., 1960), Chapter X.