Event Comment: Mainpiece [1st time; T 5, by
William Henry Ireland; incidental music by
William Linley. Prologue by
Sir James Bland Burges; Epilogue by
Robert Merry (see text)]: With new Scenes, Dresses & Decorations. The Scenes designed
and excuted by
Greenwood and Capon. The Dresses by
Johnston,
Gay &
Miss Rein. Printed slip attached to
Kemble playbill: A malevolent
and impotent attack on the
Shakspeare MSS. [i.e. those forged by W. H. Irel
and, of which this play was one] having appeared, on the Eve of representation of
Vortigern, evidently intended to injure the interest of the Proprietor of the MSS.,
Mr Samuel? Ireland [W. H. Irel
and's father] feels it impossible, within the short space of time that intervenes between the publishing
and the representation, to produce an answer to the most illiberal
and unfounded assertions in Mr Malone's enquiry [i.e.
Edmond Malone,
An Inquiry into the Authenticity of certain Papers attributed to Shakspeare, Queen Elizabeth, and Henry, Earl of Southampton, 1796]. He is therefore induced to request that Vortigern may be heard With that C
andour that has ever distinguished a British Audience. The Play is now at the Press,
and will in a very few days be laid before the Public. [But it was not issued until 1799 (see below). See also
Bernard Grebanier,
The Great Shakespeare Forgery,
London, 1966.] 4 Apr., states that the first three acts were listened to with patience, but beginning with the fourth act the play was damned, when "one tremendous yell of indignation from the pit burst simultaneously." "At four o'clock the doors of the theatre were besieged;
and, a few minutes after they were opened, the pit was crowded solely with gentlemen. Before six not a place was to be found in the boxes,
and the passages were filled...The audience betrayed symptoms of impatience
early in the representation; but, finding its taste insulted by bloated terms, which heightened the general insipidity, its reason puzzled by discordant images, false ornaments,
and abortive efforts to elevate
and astonish, pronounced its sentence of condemnation at the conclusion of the play" (
Gentleman's Magazine, Apr. 1795, pp. 346-47). "Irel
ands play of Vortigern I went to. Prologue spoken at 35 minutes past 6 [see 29 Mar.]: Play over at 10. A strong party was evidently made to support it, which clapped without opposition frequently through near 3 acts, when some ridiculous passages caused a laugh, mixed with groans-Kemble requested the audience t o hear the play out abt. the end of 4th act
and prevailed.-The Epilogue was spoken by
Mrs Jordan who skipped over some lines which claimed the play as Shakespeares.
Barrymore attempted to give the Play out for Monday next but was hooted off the stage. Kemble then came on, & after some time, was permitted to say that "
School for Scandal would be given," which the House approved by clapping.
Sturt of
Dorsetshire was in a Stage Box drunk, & exposed himself indecently to support the Play,
and when one of the stage attendants attempted to take up the green cloth [i.e. a carpet which, by custom, was laid on the stage during the concluding scene of a tragedy], Sturt seized him roughly by the head. He was slightly pelted with oranges" (Joseph
Farington, Diary, 1922, I, 145). Account-Book, 4 Apr.: Paid Irel
and his share for the 1st Night of Vortigern #102 13s. 3d.
Morning Chronicle, 29 Mar. 1799: This Day is published Vortigern
and Henry the Second (4s.). Receipts: #555 6s. 6d. (528.6.0; 26.9.6; 0.11.0)