*p1661 11 29 vere The Princess; or, Love at First Sight. An edition in 1663 (in $Killigrew='s <i>Comedies and Tragedies</i>) lists no actors' names, no prologue, no epilogue.*c1661 11 29 vere The <i>King's Company</i>. This play appears on $Herbert='s List, following the entry for 26 Oct. 1661. (See $William VanLennep=, "<i>Thomas Killigrew prepares his Plays for Production</i>," <i>J. Q. Adams Memorial Studies</i> (<i>Washington, D. C.</i>, 1948, p. 803.) <i>Pepys, Diary</i>: $W. Pen= and I to the Theatre, but it was so full that we could hardly get any room, so he went up to one of the boxes, and I into the 18d. places, and there saw <i>Love at first sight</i>, a play of $Mr Killigrew='s and the first time that it hath been acted since before the troubles, and great expectation there was, but I found the play to be a poor thing, and so I perceive every body else do. <i>BM Add. Mss. 34217</i>, fol. 31b, in $Hotson= <i>Commonwealth and Restoration Stage</i>, p. 246: @First then to speake of his Majestys Theatre@Where one would imagine Playes should be better@Love att the first sight did lead the dance@But att second sight it had the mischance@To be so dash'd out of Countenance as@It never after durst shew itts face@All though its bashfullnesse as tis thought@Be far from being the Authors ffault.@